Publications

Robustness of Structures: Final Report of COST Action TU0601

2011 | Action TU0601

Short Range Forecasting Methods of Fog, Visibility and Low Clouds

2007 | Action 722

Technical and Economic Evaluation of Dual-mode Trollybus Programmes - Final Report Theme 6 - Economic Study

1986 | Action 303

1997 Meeting of COST 822 Working Group IV Molecular Aspects of Differentiation and Transformation

1997 | Action 822

Original Document

1986 | Action 72

Policy Implications of Virtual Work

2017 | Action IS1202

Glossaire de Genetique Moleculaire et Genie Genetique

1991 | Action null

Rapport Annuel 1993/1994/1995

1995 | Action null

Database, Monitoring and Modelling of Urban Air Pollution

1995 | Action 615

Robustness of Structures: Final Report of COST Action TU0601

2011 | Action TU0601
  • Author(s): Michael Faber (Ed)
  • Publisher(s): Czech Technical University in Prague
  • ISBN/ISSN: 978-80-01-04803-0

The awareness of the significance of the robustness of structures has gradually intensified over the years due to experiences with failure and collapse of many structures. Recent events of terrorism in different parts of the world have further emphasized the urgent need for development of rational approaches to ensure that risks to people, environment, assets and functionality of the societal infrastructure and built environment are acceptable and affordable to society. A significant amount of research has hence been invested into the various aspects of robustness resulting in a number of useful recommendations on how to achieve robust structures.

However, despite many significant theoretical, methodical and technological advances over the recent years, structural robustness is still an issue of controversy and poses difficulties with regard to its interpretation as well as regulation. Modern structural design codes consider robustness through requirements which typically state that the consequence of damages to structures should not be disproportional to the causes of the damages. Despite the importance of robustness for structural design, such requirements are, however, still not substantiated in further detail; nor has the engineering profession been able to agree on an interpretation of robustness which facilitates its quantification. Hence it has become necessary to develop an elaborate framework for the assessment and quantification of structural robustness, establish acceptable criteria for robustness and hence provide for a seamless incorporation of robustness considerations into structural design procedures.

Short Range Forecasting Methods of Fog, Visibility and Low Clouds

2007 | Action 722

These proceedings have been prepared from presentations during the second midterm Workshop of COST-722 that was held in Langen, Germany, on 20 October 2005.

Policy Implications of Virtual Work

2017 | Action IS1202

Digital technologies have changed the workplace and the way we work. COST Action IS1202 – “Dynamics of Virtual Work” has gathered a group of specialists from 30 European countries and many associated institutes in other parts of the world to discuss how the new forms of digital work should be reflected in labour policies across Europe and beyond.